PRESIDENT NOYNOY AQUINO STEPPEDÂ Â Â onÂ a hornet’s nest when he vetoed a P2,000 increase in the SSS monthly pensions for those with 10-year contributions. This disturbanceÂ was confirmed by the deluge of negative comments received by ourÂ twin media of radio and newspaper.
The social scientists sayÂ that the government hasÂ a larger responsibility over those who have less in life : the elderly and the kids because they have the lowest means to cope with the vagaries of life.
SSS pensioners number about 2.1 million in the country -and growing with the improving average longevity of the Filipino today.
President Noy justified his veto saying that this increase will result in an SSS Fund operating deficit of P26-B per year and since that deficit will be refilled by the Investment Reserves of SSS- in 11 years that reserve shall have been depleted , reportedly threatening the welfare of the current 31 million paying SSS members.
This could result -presumably- in the bankruptcy of the SSS as an insurance body.
We totally disagree,Â we beg your pardon Mr. President.
Pensions received monthly have not changed since 1997 and inflation rate has hiked 200% from that year to now. Meaning net of inflation, the pension can hardly buy anything today based on 1997 prices.
And many of the pensioners areÂ either sick or are on expensive maintenance medicine.Â The pension received does not, therefore, serve to alleviate the plight of the elderly.
The SSS makes P40-B, not P 30-B, in comprehensive income for the year, so the deficit is P16-B, not P 26-B.
The Government appears to proceed in their computationÂ from the assumptions of static , non- changing facts. But there are two ways of increasing the Investment Reserve: increase income and curtail expenses.
To stay above inflation, Government should increase annual contributions of healthy members from 5% and above. On top ofÂ that- we know population grows by 2%Â p.a. and weÂ can therefore assign that percentage as annual average increase in new SSS members.
SSS Managers can improve its portfolio management results by taking an objective view on investments based on mereÂ profit and liquidity. Let us recall that among the issues raised against a former president was his illicitly influencing the sale and purchase of certain stocks to favor insider traders and himselfÂ and not the Fund itself.
It can helpÂ to maintain the Reserve if the government reducesÂ the millions of bonusesÂ given to SSS officers and directors,Â which even when legal, is morally wrong relative to the SSS contributors and pensioners.
Why let the poor aging pensioners suffer instead?
We thinkÂ that the healthy SSS contributors will not raise a howl in the 5% increase in monthly contributions every year since eventually they themselvesÂ will become the ultimate beneficiaries in their old age as future pensioners.
Moreover, the SSS will never go bankrupt because the Constitution will not allow it.Â Republic Act 8282Â Section 21Â Â provides that the Philippine Government guarantees the benefitsÂ due to SSS members and the solvency of SSS itself- or words to that effect.
Besides, when Congress passed the P2,000 (eventually vetoed by the president) pensionÂ increase for this year, it had already provided for it in the 2016 budget because government cannot spend anything not appropriated by Congress.Â So the deficit has been provided for.
Finally, what anyhowÂ is P 56-Billion as a percentage of the P3-Trillion GAA (National Budget)? A miniscule percentage.
Besides, former senator Ping Lacson claims there is a P500-B savings in the national budget -waiting to be sidetracked to approved but unfunded projects of the government’s favorites senators , congressmen and their fair-haired contractors.
Consider that theÂ P56-B is only about 10% of that P500-B, something that will certainly benefit the elderly immediatelyÂ and not beÂ squirreled away by kickbacks and commission from the use of the Savings.
According to some netizens, this brazen act of denying the pension increase through the president’s veto could mean the kiss of death for many LP members. chiefly presidential bet Mar Roxas. No, we would not go to that narrowly analyzed extent.
The president’s allies in Congress willÂ probably not override the veto of the president and embarrass the chief executive.Â But will they move for a compromise of P500 or P1,000 increase instead of P2,000?
The Palace proudly blew its horn that at least we have a president- in vetoing the bill -Â who had shown thatÂ he will decide on matters even if they are unpopular.
But this is not a case ofÂ a popularity contest.It is playing with the lives of many who are probably in the last chapters of their lives whenÂ moneyÂ is available which could just end up the hands of scoundrels which we know many public officials and their conniving private sector crooks have become.
Enough. Let us raise the pension of the SSS elderly members. Now.
For comments: email to firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com