adplus-dvertising
Ex-RCBC branch manager shows up at DOJ probe on USD81-M money laundering scam

Ex-RCBC branch manager shows up at DOJ probe on USD81-M money laundering scam

Topic |  

Ex-RCBC branch manager shows up at DOJ probe on USD81-M money laundering scam

Topic |  
 ADVERTISEMENT 

MANILA, May 3 (PNA) — Former Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation (RCBC) Jupiter branch manager Maia Deguito on Tuesday appeared at the preliminary investigation of the Department of Justice (DOJ) in connection with her alleged involvement in the USD81-million money laundering scam.

The money laundering complaint was filed by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) against Deguito and casino junket operator Kim Wong.

Deguito, accompanied by her legal counsel Atty. Ferdinand Topacio, asked the DOJ for an extension of one more week within which to file her counter-affidavit.

Topacio said that they asked for an extension to submit their counter-affidavit in light of the latest case filed by the AMLC against Philrem.

 ADVERTISEMENT 

The AMLC filed before the DOJ a money laundering complaint against money remittance company PhilRem Service Corp. (PhilRem)and its key officials in connection with the stealing of USD81 million by hackers from the Bangladesh Bank in February.

Facing a complaint for violation of the Anti-Money Laundering Act specifically Sections 4(a), (b) and (f) are top officials of PhilRem, namely: Salud Bautista, President, Michael “Concon” Bautista, Chairman of the Board and Treasurer and Anthony Pelejo, PhilRem’s Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer.

Section 4 (a), (b) and (f) refers to money laundering acts, including transacting the monetary instrument or property, converts, transfers, disposes of, moves, acquires, possesses or uses said monetary instrument or property and performs of rails to perform any act as a result of which he or she facilitated the money laundering offense.

The AMLC said that the unauthorized access to the Bangladesh Bank’s system amounted to “hacking” or “cracking,” which is punishable under Section 33 (a) of the Electronic Commerce Act.

Based on the investigation conducted by AMLC, the stolen funds were credited to the fictitious bank accounts of Michael Cruz, Jessie Christopher Lagrosas, Alfred Vergara and Enrico Vasquez, which were all opened on May 15, 2015 at the RCBC Jupiter Branch in Makati City.

The AMLC added that the dollar and peso accounts under the name of “William So Go” doing business as Centurytex Trading, which were opened on Feb. 5, 2016 and July 30, 2014, respectively, were also fictitious.

 ADVERTISEMENT 

Of the stolen funds, USD65,668,664.37, which were withdrawn from the accounts of Cruz, Lagrosas, Vergara and Vasquez, were transferred to Go and eventually to PhilRem.

 ADVERTISEMENT 

The AMLC stressed that of the US$ 65 million which were transferred to Go, US$ 13 million were transferred to the RCBC account of Abba Currency Exchange, Inc. (Abba) on Feb. 9, 2016.

That same date, USD3,230,000 were transferred from the Abba account to the RCBC account of Beacon Currency Exchange Inc. (Beacon).

On Feb. 5, 9 and 10, 2016 the balance of USD52,668,664.37 was transferred from the RCBC account of Go to the RCBC-Unimart Greenhills account of PhilRem.

 ADVERTISEMENT 

Likewise, USD15 million from Vasquez’ account were also transferred to PhilRem’s account.

Both Abba and Beacon also transferred a total of USD13 million to PhilRem’s RCBC account in Pasig City.

 ADVERTISEMENT 

The AMLC said that Pelejo submitted a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) to AMLC.

Under the STR, the PhilRem said that the transactions made were upon the instructions of “Go” but during the senate investigation, Salud said that the transactions were made upon the instructions of former RCBC Jupiter Branch Manager Maia Deguito.

The AMLC said that it was highly irregular that PhilRem would deal with Deguito and not the owner of the “Go” account.

“The foregoing circumstances clearly show that respondent spouses were aware that the funds were not legitimate when they deliberately ignored the AMLA requirements…Had they done so, respondent spouses would have personally interviewed the real William Go and discover that the latter was not aware of the existence of the RCBC Account Nos. 9016455240 and 9010270206,” the AMLC said.

“Worse, respondent spouses converted and transacted the stolen funds with another fictitious account: Centurytex,” the complaint said.

“Philrem acting as a remittance agent actually co-mingled the funds and acted as a ‘cleaning house’. Philrem’s role was to make it extremely difficult to trace the source and flow of the funds by avoiding all anti-money laundering measures set by laws and regulations. The participation of Philrem is really to ‘wash’ the funds and conceal the money trail,” the AMLC added. (PNA)

One Comment

  1. Jiwon Lim Jiwon Lim May 6, 2016

    Why does AMLC filing charges on Deguito and not on RCBC? Remember Deguito is an employee of RCBC so RCBC should be the one to be charge of Money Laundering and if there are negligence or wrong doing on the part of Deguito then the RCBC should be the one to file a case against Deguito. I think that is the right procedure.

Leave a Reply