adplus-dvertising
Court orders gov’t hospital to release contract documents

Court orders gov’t hospital to release contract documents

Topic |  

Court orders gov’t hospital to release contract documents

Topic |  
 ADVERTISEMENT 

A regional trial court judge has ordered the head of a government hospital to make available to a dialysis patient a copy of a contract involving two suppliers of hemodialysis equipment.

Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bohol, 7th Judicial Region, Branch 47 Presiding Judge Suceso Arcamo ordered Dr. Jose Teofilo Arcay, Director of the Governor Celestino Gallares Memorial Hospital (GCGMH) to “furnish and provide” Nonito Magsayo, a dialysis patient with a copy of the service contract of Fresenius Company and Toray Medical Company.

The order issued on July 19, 2016 cited the advocacy for transparency and accountability of President Rodrigo Duterte and the “Freedom of Information” as the basis for the sixteen page order.

Arcamo stressed that all government agencies under the executive department should set an example to “furnish, publish and provide the public of copies of government contracts, projects and other business transactions as a matter of transparency and accountability in public service”.

 ADVERTISEMENT 

Magsayo filed a civil case for Injunction, Preliminary, Mandatory and Prohibitory Injunction, Temporary Restraining Order and Damages against GCGMH represented by Arcay for their failure to provide copies of the service contract between the two hemodialysis equipment suppliers.

Arcamo gave due course to the demand of Magsayo for a copy of the service contract “as a matter of right as guaranteed under section 7, article lll of the 1987 Constitution”.

Arcay refused to provide copies of the contract to Magsayo because these were

private matters/transactions between the hospital and the supplier.

According to Arcay, “under the law, only those who are parties to the contract and have direct legal interest thereto have access to the same”.

The court emphasized that the refusal of Arcay to provide Magsayo a copy of the contract as it is a private transaction “is not a valid justification” since it does not involve the security of the state.

 ADVERTISEMENT 

The copy of the service contract, as ordered by the court, should be given to Magsayo within a period of fifteen days from receipt

 ADVERTISEMENT 

Civil Case No. 8711 also included “questionable policies” on the hospital policies dialysis patients, alleged “shabby treatment” by employees of the hospital and payments of hospital fees.

However, the court dismissed the petition the complaint regarding the alleged hospital policies, fees and the “shabby treatment” of dialysis patients for failure of Magsayo to exhaust administrative remedies available to the complainant.   (Chito M. Visarra)

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply